Thursday, January 1, 2009

Why I think 'The Shack' is ok

'The Shack' seems to be one of those books that you either love or hate. There are some obvious issues with it, such as the simplistic way that it addresses suffering. The resolution to Mack's problems are too neat, life is rarely that tidy!

However, I would add that God deals with us each as individuals and there are times when He does resolve things neatly. He is a God of restoration and resurrection. Our ultimate hope for resolution is in the resurrection. But there are glimmers of that today. When something dies in our life, there are opportunities for something new. I firmly believe that God does take that which has died in our lives and makes something new and good. Sometimes it isn't instant, some of these good things will not be understood until the resurrection, but He has promised that He will work all things together for good for those who love Him and are called according to His purpose (Ro 8:28). In my experience I think I find it a much greater shock when He does work things out for good in the present, but as difficult as life is "I am still confident of this: I will see the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living" (Ps 27:13).

What I liked about 'The Shack' however, was that there are many useful ideas in the book that many people would not encounter unless they undertook theological training. The material, by being included in a narrative, is much more approachable than a book like Alistair McGrath's Christian Theology. It also addresses some common issues in pop theology. Some of the useful things are:
  • The difficulty with apophatic language for understanding God
  • The equality of each of the members of the Trinity
  • That Jesus is still human, that humanity has forever been taken up into the Godhead
  • That God desires relationship with us
  • That God loves all of his children equally
  • That God cares when we are suffering
  • That love is possible because of the love within the Trinity

I really hope that some of the negative press that the book has got because of the way it inadequately deals with suffering, will not mean that people don't read it, and don't get out of it what is helpful. It like eating fish, eat the meat, spit out the bones...

God bless,
Bec

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hi Bec. I love your new blog page, with all its colours and everything. It looks great!

If you're interested in exploring "The Shack" further and weighing it up, you may be interested to read The Open House's blog entry about it at: http://www.theopenhouse.net.au/2008/12/explore_the_shack_a_little_fur.html and particularly Michael Youssef's comments at http://www.leadingtheway.org/site/PageServer?pagename=sto_TheShack_13heresies

God bless you!